Two cases of driver death caused by airbag rupture.

OBJECTIVE: This article reports two accidents caused by defective Takata airbags ruptured, which led to the deaths of the drivers. This is the first public report on the deaths caused by Takata airbags in China. METHODS: Determine the relationship between the driver death and airbag rupture through autopsy indings and vehicle inspection. RESULTS: Due to defects in the design of Takata's inflator, moist air was permitted to slowly enter the inflator, resulting the PSAN slowly degraded physically. The damaged propellant burned more rapidly than intended and overpressurized the inflator's steel housing, causing fragmentation and flying debris at high speed, killing or injuring vehicle occupants. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there are still tens of millions of defective Takata airbags that have not been recalled for repair, posing safety risks. This article suggests taking preventive measures to avoid the occurrence of similar accidents.

History of NHTSA's upgrade of FMVSS 208 addressing airbag induced fatalities and serious injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to provide a history of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA's) extensive efforts of incorporating advanced airbag technology capability beyond that available in first-generation airbag systems into FMVSS No. 208. METHODS: In the paper, NHTSA's actions and their collaborative efforts with automakers, automaker suppliers, insurance industry, academia, and other Federal agencies were reviewed, and the key efforts have been highlighted. Through their efforts, NHTSA developed its strategy by first undertaking near term actions and then undertaking the strategy for longer term actions. Rulemaking was undertaken in three steps. Then, as sufficient data became available, NHTSA documented the effectiveness of the rulemakings. RESULTS: The approach taken by NHTSA with the goal of preserving the safety benefits of the first-generation of frontal airbags while minimizing their danger to children and at-risk adults paved the way for the advanced airbags final rule and an interim final rule issued on May 12, 2000 (see Federal Register Notice 65 FR 30680). A follow-up final rule was issued on August 31, 2006, to change the test speed of the belted 5th percentile female dummy from 48 km/h to 56 km/h (30 mph to 35 mph). The final rule was updated on November 2, 2007, to permit manufacturers to earn advance credits for vehicles that are certified in compliance with the new higher speed requirement one year in advance of the regulatory requirements. CONCLUSION: NHTSA engagement in efforts with multiple partners toward identifying the safety issues, was an integral part of NHTSA's strategy in addressing the problem, arriving at immediate actions that NHTSA took, and detailing a comprehensive look at the longer-term approach required to resolve the safety issues. The approach taken by NHTSA paved the way for the advanced airbags final rule and an interim final rule issued on May 12, 2000 (Federal Register Notice 65 FR 30680). NHTSA had undertaken a successful collaboration of the Federal Government, the automobile industry, equipment suppliers, insurance companies, traffic safety advocates, law enforcement agencies from across the country, and the media to solve the airbag related safety issue.

Summary of influences that led to introduction of frontal airbags on US passenger vehicles.

OBJECTIVE: The history of airbags for occupant protection in frontal crashes is reviewed from the perspective of a former Senior Executive at NHTSA from the early 1970's to the late 1980's. This paper summarizes the factors that led to regulatory delays as well as those that led to voluntary adoption of airbags by several manufacturers. METHODS: The regulatory history and interactions with airbag suppliers and vehicle manufactures is recounted citing key steps in the evolution of frontal airbags. RESULTS: When the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Standard 208, "Occupant Protection" was issued on July 2, 1969 the Safety Agency anticipated that the industry response would provide automatic frontal crash protection from airbags that deployed to protect all front seat occupants from injury in severe frontal crashes. It was not until, September 1, 1998 that airbags were required in all cars and light trucks. The interim 29 years involved a series of stops and starts during which most of the original airbag suppliers lost interest and abandoned the airbag market. The issues associated with airbags and their place in Standard 208 were directly influenced by interventions from the President, the Congress, the Supreme Court, Secretaries of Transportation, NHTSA Administrators, the Presidents of US Auto Companies and Senior Executives of Insurance Companies. CONCLUSION: In 1966, there was support from the US auto industry for a single source of safety regulations that apply to new vehicles sold in the US. This is evidenced by the unanimous passage by the House of Representatives and Senate of the Law that created the Federal auto safety regulatory framework. The Law also required seatbelts in new cars and prohibited States from making separate safety rules. However, the large safety benefits offered by seatbelts were negated because they were rarely used. Consequently, finding ways of providing high levels of protection without requiring action by occupants became a goal of the new Safety Agency. The airbag offered the possibility of achieving that goal.From the initial airbag notice of proposed rulemaking on July 2, 1969, Safety Agency required 2 years to resolve objections before a final Standard 208 could be issued (on July 8,1971). The subsequent industry opposition to the Standard 208 employed Presidential influence and Court suits to cause a 5½ year delay until the Coleman Decision on December 6, 1976. Changes in regulatory approach of the Ford, Carter, and Reagan Administrations and associated Court suits caused another 7½ year delay until the Dole Decision on July 17, 1984. It required another 7 ½, until December 18, 1991, for market forces to reduce industry opposition to airbags and permit Congress to pass a law that mandated them. Another 6½ years of lead time was required before all cars and light trucks were required to meet the airbag standard. During the mid and late 1980's vehicle safety ratings, seatbelt use laws, and Vince and Larry PSA's had all acted to increase safety awareness and safety belt use. Consequently, added public demand for vehicle safety features slowly developed. Changes in economic incentives encouraged a number of vehicle lines to install driver airbags as standard equipment and the feature was being widely advertised by Chrysler. This combination of events made it possible for Congress to pass and President Bush 41 to sign legislation requiring airbags in cars and light trucks by September 1, 1998 - more than 29 years after the initial rulemaking notice in 1969.

An investigation of heterogeneous impact, temporal stability, and aggregate shift in factors affecting the driver injury severity in single-vehicle rollover crashes.

Single-vehicle rollover crashes have been acknowledged as a predominant highway crash type resulting in serious casualties. To investigate the heterogeneous impact of factors determining different injury severity levels in single-vehicle rollover crashes, the random parameters logit model with unobserved heterogeneity in means and variances was employed in this paper. A five-year dataset on single-vehicle rollover crashes, gathered in California from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017, was utilized. Driver injury severities that were determined to be outcome variables include no injury, minor injury, and severe injury. Characteristics pertaining to the crash, driver, temporal, vehicle, roadway, and environment were acknowledged as potential determinants. The results showed that the gender indicator specified to minor injury was consistently identified as a significant random parameter in four years' models and the joint five-year model, excluding the 2016 crash model where the night indicator associated with no injury was observed to produce the random effect. Additionally, two series of likelihood ratio tests were conducted to assess the year-to-year and aggregate-to-component temporal stability of model estimation results. Marginal effects of explanatory variables were also calculated and compared to analyze the temporal stability and interpret the results. The findings revealed an overall temporal instability of model specifications across individual years, while there is no significant aggregate-to-component variation. Injury severities were observed to be stably affected by several variables, including improper turn indicator, under the influence of alcohol indicator, old driver indicator, seatbelt indicator, insurance indicator, and airbag indicator. Furthermore, the year-to-year and aggregate-to-component shift was quantified and characterized by calculating the differences in probabilities between within-sample observations and out-of-sample predictions. The overall results imply that continuing to expand and refine the model to incorporate more comprehensive datasets can result in more robust and stable injury severity prediction, thus benefiting in mitigating the associated driver injury severity.

Effect of an Airbag-selective Portal Vein Blood Arrester on the Liver after Hepatectomy: A New Technique for Selective Clamping of the Portal Vein.

OBJECTIVE: A novel technique was explored using an airbag-selective portal vein blood arrester that circumvents the need for an intraoperative assessment of anatomical variations in patients with complex intrahepatic space-occupying lesions. METHODS: Rabbits undergoing hepatectomy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: intermittent portal triad clamping (PTC), intermittent portal vein clamping (PVC), intermittent portal vein blocker with an airbag-selective portal vein blood arrester (APC), and without portal blood occlusion (control). Hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury were assessed by measuring the 7-day survival rate, blood loss, liver function, hepatic pathology, hepatic inflammatory cytokine infiltration, hepatic malondialdehyde levels, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen levels. RESULTS: Liver damage was substantially reduced in the APC and PVC groups. The APC animals exhibited transaminase levels similar to or less oxidative stress damage and inflammatory hepatocellular injury compared to those exhibited by the PVC animals. Bleeding was significantly higher in the control group than in the other groups. The APC group had less bleeding than the PVC group because of the avoidance of portal vein skeletonization during hepatectomy. Thus, more operative time was saved in the APC group than in the PVC group. Moreover, the total 7-day survival rate in the APC group was higher than that in the PTC group. CONCLUSION: Airbag-selective portal vein blood arresters may help protect against hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury in rabbits undergoing partial hepatectomy. This technique may also help prevent liver damage in patients requiring hepatectomy.

Estimation of Injury Limits at Vulnerable Impact Locations Along the Forearm Via THUMS AM50 Finite Element Model at Airbag Loading Rates.

Side and frontal airbag deployment represents the main injury mechanism to the upper extremity during automotive collisions. Previous dynamic injury limit research has been limited to testing the forearm at either the assumed most vulnerable location to fracture, the distal 1/3rd, or the midpoint. Studies have varied the surface to which impacts were applied, with no clear consensus on the site of greatest vulnerability. The unpredictability of airbag impact location, especially with altered hand positioning, limits the effectiveness of existing forearm injury limits determined from impacts at only one location. The current study quantified the effect of impacts at alternative locations on injury risk along the forearm using the THUMS FE model. Airbag-level impacts were simulated along the forearm on all four anatomical surfaces. Results showed the distal 1/3rd is not the most vulnerable location (for any side), indicating forearm fracture is not solely driven by area moment of inertia (as previously assumed). The posterior forearm was the weakest, suggesting that current test standards underestimate the fracture risk of the forearm. Linear regression models showed strong correlation between forearm fracture risk and bone geometry (cross-sectional area and area moment of inertia) as well as soft-tissue depth, potentially providing the ability to predict forearm injury tolerances for any location or forearm size. This study demonstrated the forearm's vulnerability to fracture from airbag deployments, indicating the need for safety systems to better address injury mechanisms for the upper limb to effectively protect drivers.

History of airbag safety benefits and risks.

OBJECTIVE: The history of airbags was reviewed for benefits and risks as they became a supplement to lap-shoulder belts. Sled and crash tests were evaluated and field data was analyzed for airbag effectiveness. Field data on airbag deaths and studies on mechanisms of deployment injury were analyzed. The history was reviewed as airbags evolved from the early 1970s to today. METHODS: Airbag benefits were determined from NHTSA crash tests with unbelted and belted dummies in 40, 48, and 56 km/h (25, 30, and 35 mph) frontal impacts with and without airbags. The literature was reviewed for testing of passive restraints with and without airbags. Recent NCAP tests were compared with earlier tests to determine the change in occupant responses with seatbelts and supplemental airbags in modern vehicles. 1994-2015 NASS-CDS field data was analyzed for MAIS 4 + F injury. Risks were compared for belted and unbelted occupants in frontal impacts by delta V. Airbag risks were identified from field deployments and research. The 1973-76 GM fleet had two deaths due to the occupant being out-of-position (OOP). The mechanisms of injury were determined. From 1989-2003, NHTSA investigated 93 driver, 184 child passenger, and 13 adult passenger airbag deaths. The data was reviewed for injury mechanisms. Second generation airbags essentially eliminated OOP airbag deaths. More recently, three suppliers were linked to airbag rupture deaths. The circumstances for ruptures were reviewed. RESULTS: The risk for serious head injury was 5.495% in drivers and 4.435% passengers in 40-48 km/h (25-30 mph) frontal crash tests without belts or airbags. It was 80.5% lower at 1.073% in drivers and 82.0% at 0.797% in passengers with belts and airbags in 35 mph NCAP crash tests of 2012-20 MY vehicles. NASS-CDS field data showed a 15.45% risk for severe injury (MAIS 4 + F) to unbelted occupants and 4.68% with belted occupants in 30-35 mph frontal crash delta V with airbags, as deployed. The reduction in risk was 69.7% with belt use and airbags deploying in 96.1% of crashes. There were benefits over the range of delta V. Two airbag deaths were studied from the 1970s GM fleet of airbags. The unbelted driver death was caused by punchout force with the airbag cover blocked by the occupant and membrane forces as the airbag wrapped around the head, neck or chest with the occupant close to the inflating airbag. The unbelted child death was from airbag inflation forces from pre-impact braking causing the child to slide forward into the deploying airbag. Research showed that unrestrained children may have 13 different positions near the passenger airbag at deployment. NHTSA investigation of first generation airbag deaths found most driver deaths were females (75.3%) sitting forward on the seat track, close to the driver airbag. Seatbelt use was only 30%. Most child deaths (138, 75.4%) involved no or improper use of the lap-shoulder belts. Of these, 115 deaths involved pre-impact braking. Only 37 (20.2%) children were in child seats with 29 in rear-facing and 8 in forward-facing child seats. Eight child deaths (4.4%) occurred with lap-shoulder belt use. Airbag designs changed. More recently, Takata airbags were related to at least 24 deaths by airbag rupture prompting a recall; the successor company Joyson had an airbag recall. ARC airbags have experienced a chunk of the inflator propelled into the driver during deployment with several deaths leading to a recall. CONCLUSIONS: Airbags are effective in preventing death and injury in crashes. They provide the greatest protection in combination with seatbelt use. NHTSA estimated airbags saved 28,244 lives through 1-1-09 while causing at least 320 deployment deaths, which has prompted improved designs, testing, and recalls.

Frontal NCAP performance and field injury over 40 years.

OBJECTIVES: Vehicle and occupant responses in 35 mph NCAP tests were determined for small-midsize passenger cars grouped around model year (MY) 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020. A baseline was established with 1980 vehicles not designed for NCAP. The results of four decades of vehicles designed for NCAP were compared to the baseline. The study also determined the risk for serious injury (MAIS 3 + F) by vehicle model year (MY) using 1989-2015 NASS and 2017-2020 CISS. It explored safety trends in frontal crashes over 50 MYs of vehicles. METHODS: The 1980 baseline group was established with 10 1979-1983 MY passenger cars weighing <1,500 kg. Four decades of vehicle crash tests from five manufacturers established trends in vehicle dynamics and dummy responses over four decades of vehicles designed for NCAP. Triaxial acceleration of the head and chest were reanalyzed for each test to have a consistent set of responses over five decades. The risk for serious injury (MAIS 3 + F) to the driver and front passenger was determined by vehicle MY using 1989-2015 NASS and 2017-2020 CISS with belted and unbelted drivers and right-front passengers. The data was sorted in four MY groups 1961-1989 MY, 1990-1999 MY, 2000-2009 MY and 2010 MY-2021 MY. The risk for MAIS 3 + F injury was determined with standard errors using weighted data. RESULTS: The 1980 NCAP tests brought about changes in vehicle structures and occupant restraints by 1990; however, HIC15 and 3 ms chest acceleration have not changed much the past 20 years since the use of advanced airbags and seatbelts with pretensioner and load-limiters. For the driver, HIC15 dropped 40 ± 19% from the 1980 to 1990 NCAP tests and dropped further to 76 ± 32% in 2020. The percentage drops after 1990 were not statistically significant. The driver 3 ms chest acceleration dropped 18 ± 5% from 1980 to 1990 and plateaued with 22 ± 6% in 2020. For the front passenger, HIC15 dropped 68 ± 52% from the 1980 to 1990 NCAP tests and plateaued at 71 ± 49% in 2020. The passenger 3 ms chest acceleration dropped 13 ± 5% from 1980 to 1990 and has fluctuated with minimal change. Injury risks based on responses show the same initial drop in 1990 and have remained essentially constant. Nothing meaningful has changed in dummy responses in the past 20 years of NCAP testing. The field data found the belted driver MAIS 3 + F risk was 1.66 ± 0.37% in 1961-1989 MY vehicles and 1.39 ± 0.33% in 2010-2021 MY vehicles. For belted right-front passengers, the risk was 1.52 ± 0.39% in 1961-1989 MY vehicles and 1.42 ± 0.46% in 2010-2021 MY vehicles. The field data shows no meaningful change in injury risk in 50 MYs of vehicles. NCAP involves 35-40 mph delta-V, which represents a small fraction, 0.33%, of belted occupant exposure and only 8.6% of severe injury based on 1994-2015 NASS. CONCLUSIONS: The NCAP test lacks field relevance. Manufacturers are merely "tuning" the restraint systems for star ratings without meaningful changes in field injury risks the past 20 years. There are disbenefits of "tuning" safety for a single, high-severity crash when most of the severe injury occurs in lower severity crashes. NHTSA should reevaluate plans to change the dummy to Thor and add BrIC injury criteria to assess NCAP responses. These changes would cause manufacturers to further "tune" structures, restraints and interiors without meaningful effects in real-world crashes.

Modeling occupant injury severities for electric-vehicle-involved crashes using a vehicle-accident bi-layered correlative framework with matched-pair sampling.

This study seeks to investigate occupant injury severities for electric-vehicle-involved crashes and inspect if electric vehicles lead to more serious injuries than fuel-powered vehicles, which have commonly been neglected in past studies. A Bayesian random slope model is proposed aiming to capture interactions between occupant injury severity levels and electric vehicle variable. The random slope model is developed under a vehicle-accident bi-layered correlative framework, which can account for the interactive effects of vehicles in the same accident. Based on the crash report sampling system (CRSS) 2020 and 2021 database, the extracted observations are formed into inherently matched pairs under certain matching variables including restraint system use, air bag deployed, ejection and rollover. The introduced data structure is able to ensure the standard error of the modeling parameters are not affected by these matching variables. Meanwhile, a comprehensive modeling performance comparison is conducted between the Bayesian random slope model and the Bayesian random intercept model, the Bayesian basic model. According to the empirical results, the bi-layered Bayesian random slope model presents a strong ability in model fitting and analysis, even when the sample size is small and the error structure is complex. Most importantly, occupants in electric vehicles are more likely to suffer serious injuries, especially incapacitating and fatal injuries, in the event of an accident compared to fuel-powered vehicles, which disproving the long-held misconception that green and safety are related.

Injury comparisons between paired drivers and front-seat passengers in frontal collisions using publicly available crash and injury data.

Forensic engineers and crash safety researchers sometimes use the injuries of a seatbelted occupant to infer the injury risk of an unbelted occupant in the same crash, had they instead been wearing a seatbelt. It is unclear, however, whether this inference is valid or how often two occupants in the same collision have similar injuries. Here, we sought to compare the injury outcomes between drivers and front-seat passengers in frontal collisions using real-world collision data. We compared the injury severity, quantified using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), of 22 injury categories between front-seat occupants with matching seatbelt use and airbag deployment in single-event frontal collisions recorded in the publicly available National Automotive Sampling System, Crashworthiness Data System (years 1993-2015) database to assess whether they had similar severity injuries. We analyzed the four combinations of seatbelt use and airbag deployment and all seatbelt/airbag conditions combined. In only 3 of 88 combinations of injuries and seatbelt/airbag conditions did more than 50% of occupant pairs have the same AIS score, although the related confidence intervals showed these proportions were not significantly greater than 50%. In contrast, we found 19 combinations of injuries and seatbelt/airbag conditions where one occupant was consistently injured more severely than the other. Our findings show that injury outcome is not similar for both front-seat occupants in the same frontal collision with similar seatbelt and airbag conditions; however, one may be able to predict that one occupant would be more severely injured than their fellow occupant.

Evaluation of Brain Rotational Injury Criteria (BrIC) in vehicle frontal crashes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate strains in the human brain in regulatory, research, and due care frontal crashes by simulating those impacts. In addition, brain strain simulations were estimated for belted human volunteer tests and in impacts between two players in National Football League (NFL), some with no injury and some with mild Traumatic Brain Injuries (mTBI). METHODS: The brain strain responses were determined using version 5 of the Global Human Body Modeling Consortium (GHBMC) 50th percentile human brain model. One hundred and sixty simulations with the brain model were conducted using rotational velocities and accelerations of Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATD's) or those of human volunteers in sled or crash tests, as inputs to the model and strain related responses like Maximum Principal Strains (MPS) and Cumulative Strain Damage Measure (CSDM) in various regions of the brain were monitored. The simulated vehicle tests ranged from sled tests at 24 and 32 kph delta-V with three-point belts without airbags to full scale crash and sled tests at 56 kph and a series of Research Mobile Deformable Barrier (RMDB) tests described in Prasad et al. RESULTS: The severity of rotational input into the model as represented by BrIC, averaged between 0.5 and 1.2 for the various test conditions, and as high as 1.5 for an individual case. The MPS responses for the various test conditions averaged between 0.28 and 0.86 and as high as 1.3 in one test condition. The MPS responses in the brain for volunteers, low velocity sled, and NCAP tests were similar to those in the no-mTBI group in the NFL cases and consistent with real world accident data. The MPS responses of the brain in angular crash and sled tests were similar to those in the mTBI group. CONCLUSIONS: The brain strain estimations do not indicate the likelihood of severe-to-fatal brain injuries in the crash environments studied in this paper. However, using the risk functions associated with BrIC, severe-to-fatal brain injuries (AIS4+) are predicted in several environments in which they are not observed or expected.

Minimal invasive transnasal endoscopic removal of intracranial foreign body after airbag deployment.

Airbag induced injuries such as skull and cervical spine fractures, epidural and subdural hematomas, atlantooccipital dislocations or brainstem lacerations are already documented in published literature, however, no previous case have been published about a penetrating foreign body of the skull base following airbag deployment. Removal of an intracranial foreign body is very dangerous and difficult, or even if it possible and necessary, requires open surgery in most of the cases. In this article we present the minimal invasive, transnasal removal of a coin from the intracranial, frontobasal region using high-resolution endoscopy combined with image-guided navigation.
We report the case of a 59-year-old male who was brought to the emergency department after a car accident. He suffered a penetrating injury by a coin that was placed on the car’s airbag at the moment of the accident. Upon the airbag being deployed the foreign body entered the skin through the right lower eyelid, crossing the orbital cavity, ethmoid cells, sphenoid sinus and the anterior part of the planum sphenoidale at an equal distance of 2mm from the two internal carotid arteries, extending into the intracranial space, without injuring the pituitary stalk and the chiasm. We proceeded to remove the coin endoscopically using a transnasal transseptal transsphenoidal approach under general anesthesia. The dura was closed with a multilayer skull base reconstruction technique using two layers of abdominal free fat and nasal septal mucoperiosteal flap. There were no postoperative complications, nor CSF rhinorrhea. The patient was discharged 10 days after the operation.
To our knowledge, this is the first publi­shed case of a penetrating foreign body of the skull base, extending into the intracranial cavity following airbag deployment. In some dedicated cases, a minimal invasive endoscopic approach should be considered as an alternative to anterior craniotomy if access is possible when foreign bodies from the skull base area need to be removed. This procedure is efficient, safe and minimally invasive. 

TinyFallNet: A Lightweight Pre-Impact Fall Detection Model.

Falls represent a significant health concern for the elderly. While studies on deep learning-based preimpact fall detection have been conducted to mitigate fall-related injuries, additional efforts are needed for embedding in microcomputer units (MCUs). In this study, ConvLSTM, the state-of-the-art model, was benchmarked, and we attempted to lightweight it by leveraging features from image-classification models VGGNet and ResNet while maintaining performance for wearable airbags. The models were developed and evaluated using data from young subjects in the KFall public dataset based on an inertial measurement unit (IMU), leading to the proposal of TinyFallNet based on ResNet. Despite exhibiting higher accuracy (97.37% < 98.00%) than the benchmarked ConvLSTM, the proposed model requires lower memory (1.58 MB > 0.70 MB). Additionally, data on the elderly from the fall data of the FARSEEING dataset and activities of daily living (ADLs) data of the KFall dataset were analyzed for algorithm validation. This study demonstrated the applicability of image-classification models to preimpact fall detection using IMU and showed that additional tuning for lightweighting is possible due to the different data types. This research is expected to contribute to the lightweighting of deep learning models based on IMU and the development of applications based on IMU data.

Optimizing frontal impact occupant protection systems for passengers seated in wheelchairs.

OBJECTIVE: The advent of automated vehicles (AVs) provides an opportunity to design integrated wheelchair seating stations that provide an equivalent level of safety for occupants using wheelchairs as those using vehicle seating. This study designed a frontal occupant protection system for an integrated second-row wheelchair seating station that includes optimized airbags and seatbelt systems. METHODS: MADYMO models were used to optimize belt geometry for a midsized male ATD seated in a surrogate wheelchair fixture, with and without inclusion of a Self Conforming Rearseat Air Bag (SCaRAB). Sled tests were performed to confirm the benefits of airbag use and optimized belt geometry. Additional modeling was performed with commercial manual and power wheelchairs, to identify the effects of wheelchair design and forward clear space on occupant kinematics and injury measures. Additional sled tests were performed with manual and power wheelchairs to demonstrate effectiveness of the restraint system with commercial products. RESULTS: Simulations and tests both showed improved kinematics using an optimized seatbelt system geometry compared to a commonly used suboptimal D-ring location that places the shoulder belt at a more outboard location. Use of the SCaRAB helped compensate for suboptimal geometry. Results include specific recommendations for belt geometry relative to the wheelchair seating station and airbag parameters suitable for protecting occupants seated in wheelchairs. Restraint systems initially optimized using the surrogate wheelchair also performed well with the two commercial wheelchairs. The clear space required for maneuvering a wheelchair will likely prevent injurious head contact in frontal crashes. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to design a frontal optimal occupant protection system for an integrated second-row wheelchair seating station, demonstrating that it should be feasible once integrated wheelchair seating stations are included in AVs.

Driver Injury from Vehicle Side Impacts When Automatic Emergency Braking and Active Seat Belts Are Used.

As an advanced driver assistance system, automatic emergency braking (AEB) can effectively reduce accidents by using high-precision and high-coverage sensors. In particular, it has a significant advantage in reducing front-end collisions and rear-end accidents. Unfortunately, avoiding side collisions is a challenging problem for AEB. To tackle these challenges, we propose active seat belt pretensioning on driver injury in vehicles equipped with AEB in unavoidable side crashes. Firstly, records of impact cases from China's National Automobile Accident In-Depth Investigation System were used to investigate a scenario in which a vehicle is impacted by an oncoming car after the vehicle's AEB system is triggered. The scenario was created using PreScan software. Then, the simulated vehicles in the side impact were devised using a finite element model of the Toyota Yaris and a moving barrier. These were constructed in HyperMesh software along with models of the driver's side seatbelt, side airbag, and side curtain airbag. Moreover, the models were verified, and driver out-of-position instances and injuries were evaluated in simulations with different AEB intensities up to 0.7 g for three typical side impact angles. Last but not least, the optimal combination of seatbelt pretensioning and the timing thereof for minimizing driver injury at each side impact angle was identified using orthogonal tests; immediate (at 0 ms) pretensioning at 80 N was applied. Our experiments show that our active seatbelt with the above parameters reduced the weighted injury criterion by 5.94%, 22.05%, and 20.37% at impact angles of 90°, 105°, and 120°, respectively, compared to that of a conventional seatbelt. The results of the experiment can be used as a reference to appropriately set the collision parameters of active seat belts for vehicles with AEB.

Protection Effect of Elbow Joint Airbag on Patients with Upper Limb Fractures: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Wound healing is delayed because of swelling after upper limb fracture, and the traditional rehabilitation device used in physical therapy cannot flexibly adjust the fixation. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the designed elbow joint airbag protection device used in patients with upper arm fractures. Methods: This is a quasi-randomized controlled trial. From November 2022 to March 2023, 70 hospitalized patients with unilateral upper arm fractures were recruited from a general tertiary hospital in eastern China. The patients were divided into an experimental group and a control group according to the random number table at 1:1. Among them, 35 patients who received elbow joint airbag protection for post-traumatic limb swelling were assigned to the experimental group, and the other 35 patients were assigned to the control group. The degree of swelling regression, a score of resting pain, and patient comfort level was compared between the two groups. Results: The waiting time from swelling to allowing for surgery and pain score at rest were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < .05 and P < .001 respectively). The comfort score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P < .05), and these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: The elbow joint airbag protection can significantly reduce the waiting time for surgery, lessen the degree of swelling regression, reduce the pain in patients' hands caused by swelling, and significantly improve the comfort level. Hence, it is worth promoting in the clinical practice of orthopedic nursing.

Evaluation of full-face, open-face, and airbag-equipped helmets for facial impact protection.

OBJECTIVE: Two-wheeler riders frequently sustain injuries to the head and face in real-world crashes, including traumatic brain injury, basilar skull fracture, and facial fracture. Different types of helmets exist today, which are recognized as preventing head injuries in general; however, their efficacy and limitations in facial impact protection are underexplored. Biofidelic surrogate test devices and assessment criteria are lacking in current helmet standards. This study addresses these gaps by applying a new, more biofidelic test method to evaluate conventional full-face helmets and a novel airbag-equipped helmet design. Ultimately, this study aims to contribute to better helmet design and testing standards. METHODS: Facial impact tests at two locations, mid-face and lower face, were conducted with a complete THOR dummy. Forces applied to the face and at the junction of the head and neck were measured. Brain strain was predicted by a finite element head model taking both linear and rotational head kinematics as input. Four helmet types were evaluated: full-face motorcycle and bike helmets, a novel design called a face airbag (an inflatable structure integrated into an open-face motorcycle helmet), and an open-face motorcycle helmet. The unpaired, two-sided student's t-test was performed between the open-face helmet and the others, which featured face-protective designs. RESULTS: A substantial reduction in brain strain and facial forces was found with the full-face motorcycle helmet and face airbag. Upper neck tensile forces increased slightly with both full-face motorcycle (14.4%, p >.05) and bike helmets (21.7%, p =.039). The full-face bike helmet reduced the brain strain and facial forces for lower-face impacts, but not for mid-face impacts. The motorcycle helmet reduced mid-face impact forces while slightly increasing forces in the lower face. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The chin guards of full-face helmets and the face airbag protect by reducing facial load and brain strain for lower face impact; however, the full-face helmets' influence on neck tension and increased risk for basilar skull fracture need further investigation. The motorcycle helmet's visor re-directed mid-face impact forces to the forehead and lower face via the helmet's upper rim and chin guard: a thus-far undescribed protective mechanism. Given the significance of the visor for facial protection, an impact test procedure should be included in helmet standards, and the use of helmet visors promoted. A simplified, yet biofidelic, facial impact test method should be included in future helmet standards to ensure a minimum level of protection performance.

Wilderness Rescue of a Hiker with Multiple Trapped Limbs by a Combined Wilderness and Urban Rescue Team Using High-Pressure Airbags.

We report on the case of a 28-y-old man with both legs and left arm trapped for nearly 6 h after falling and subsequently being trapped by a boulder during a hike in the wilderness. Extrication required equipment designed for urban environments and was operated by an unconventional team of rescue professionals. The patient experienced multiple right lower-extremity orthopedic injuries, acute kidney injury secondary to rhabdomyolysis, and bilateral segmental pulmonary emboli. In this article, we detail the extrication and review the treatment guidelines for crush injuries that focus on aggressive fluid resuscitation prior to and during extrication and medication administration only if hyperkalemia presents. Wilderness rescuers should plan for the use of unconventional rescue equipment in austere prolonged rescue scenarios.

Analysis of injury mechanism and thoracic response of elderly, small female PMHS in near-side impact scenarios.

OBJECTIVE: In 2020, 17% of all crash fatalities were individuals aged 65 years or older. Crash data also revealed that for older occupants, thoracic related injuries are among the leading causes of fatality. Historically, the majority of near-side impact postmortem human subjects (PMHS) studies used a generic load wall to capture external loads that were applied to PMHS. While these data were helpful in documenting biofidelity, they did not represent a realistic response an occupant would undergo in a near-side crash. The objective of this research was to test small, elderly female PMHS in a repeatable, realistic near-side impact crash scenario to investigate current injury criteria as they relate to this vulnerable population. METHOD: Ten small, elderly PMHS were subjected to a realistic near-side impact loading condition. The PMHS were targeted to be elderly females age 60+, approximately 5th percentile in height and weight, with osteopenic areal bone mineral density. Each subject was seated on a mass-production seat, equipped with a side airbag and standard three-point restraint with a pretensioner. Other boundary conditions included an intruding driver's side door. PMHS instrumentation included strain gages on ribs 3-10 bilaterally to identify fracture timing. Two chestbands were used to measure chest deflection, one at the level of the axilla and one at the level of the xiphoid process. RESULTS: Injuries observed included rib fractures, particularly on the struck side, and in multiple cases a flail chest was observed. Eight of ten subjects resulted in AIS3+ thoracic injuries, despite previously tested ATDs predicting less than a 10% chance of AIS3+ injury. Subjects crossed the threshold for AIS3 injury in the range of only 1% - 9% chest compression. Additionally, mechanisms of injury varied, as some injuries were incurred by door interactions while others came during airbag interactions. CONCLUSIONS: This research points to two areas of concern that likely require further analysis: (1) the appropriateness of potentially oversimplified PMHS testing to establish injury thresholds and define injury criteria for complicated crash scenarios; (2) the importance of identifying the precise timing of injuries to better understand the effect of current passive restraint systems.